Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
HC allowed the appeal under Section 37 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, finding the arbitral award fundamentally flawed. The court invalidated the entire award primarily based on unauthenticated CA certificates lacking evidentiary substantiation. The awarded sum of Rs. 65,50,795/- was disallowed due to absence of supporting documentation and unexamined foundational documents. The court determined that the arbitration award's core financial claims were unsupported, thereby rendering the entire monetary determination legally unsustainable. No interference was deemed necessary regarding interest calculations or arbitration costs, with the appeal being comprehensively allowed in favor of the appellant.
HC allowed the appeal under Section 37 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, finding the arbitral award fundamentally flawed. The court invalidated the entire award primarily based on unauthenticated CA certificates lacking evidentiary substantiation. The awarded sum of Rs. 65,50,795/- was disallowed due to absence of supporting documentation and unexamined foundational documents. The court determined that the arbitration award's core financial claims were unsupported, thereby rendering the entire monetary determination legally unsustainable. No interference was deemed necessary regarding interest calculations or arbitration costs, with the appeal being comprehensively allowed in favor of the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
