Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
HC allowed the appeal under Section 37 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, finding the arbitral award fundamentally flawed. The court invalidated the entire award primarily based on unauthenticated CA certificates lacking evidentiary substantiation. The awarded sum of Rs. 65,50,795/- was disallowed due to absence of supporting documentation and unexamined foundational documents. The court determined that the arbitration award's core financial claims were unsupported, thereby rendering the entire monetary determination legally unsustainable. No interference was deemed necessary regarding interest calculations or arbitration costs, with the appeal being comprehensively allowed in favor of the appellant.
HC allowed the appeal under Section 37 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, finding the arbitral award fundamentally flawed. The court invalidated the entire award primarily based on unauthenticated CA certificates lacking evidentiary substantiation. The awarded sum of Rs. 65,50,795/- was disallowed due to absence of supporting documentation and unexamined foundational documents. The court determined that the arbitration award's core financial claims were unsupported, thereby rendering the entire monetary determination legally unsustainable. No interference was deemed necessary regarding interest calculations or arbitration costs, with the appeal being comprehensively allowed in favor of the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
