Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
HC allowed the appeal under Section 37 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, finding the arbitral award fundamentally flawed. The court invalidated the entire award primarily based on unauthenticated CA certificates lacking evidentiary substantiation. The awarded sum of Rs. 65,50,795/- was disallowed due to absence of supporting documentation and unexamined foundational documents. The court determined that the arbitration award's core financial claims were unsupported, thereby rendering the entire monetary determination legally unsustainable. No interference was deemed necessary regarding interest calculations or arbitration costs, with the appeal being comprehensively allowed in favor of the appellant.
HC allowed the appeal under Section 37 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, finding the arbitral award fundamentally flawed. The court invalidated the entire award primarily based on unauthenticated CA certificates lacking evidentiary substantiation. The awarded sum of Rs. 65,50,795/- was disallowed due to absence of supporting documentation and unexamined foundational documents. The court determined that the arbitration award's core financial claims were unsupported, thereby rendering the entire monetary determination legally unsustainable. No interference was deemed necessary regarding interest calculations or arbitration costs, with the appeal being comprehensively allowed in favor of the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
