Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC upheld conviction for dishonour of security cheques under Section 138 of NI Act. The accused issued cheques to repay a loan, which were dishonoured with "insufficient funds" endorsement. The court confirmed that security cheques attract liability for offence. Complainant proved service of legal notice, and accused failed to rebut presumptions under Sections 118(a), 139, and 146 of NI Act. All statutory ingredients were satisfied, warranting six-month imprisonment and compensation of Rs. 15,60,000. The appellate court's decision was deemed appropriate, with no excessive sentencing. Petition dismissed.
HC upheld conviction for dishonour of security cheques under Section 138 of NI Act. The accused issued cheques to repay a loan, which were dishonoured with "insufficient funds" endorsement. The court confirmed that security cheques attract liability for offence. Complainant proved service of legal notice, and accused failed to rebut presumptions under Sections 118(a), 139, and 146 of NI Act. All statutory ingredients were satisfied, warranting six-month imprisonment and compensation of Rs. 15,60,000. The appellate court's decision was deemed appropriate, with no excessive sentencing. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.