Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
HC upheld conviction for dishonour of security cheques under Section 138 of NI Act. The accused issued cheques to repay a loan, which were dishonoured with "insufficient funds" endorsement. The court confirmed that security cheques attract liability for offence. Complainant proved service of legal notice, and accused failed to rebut presumptions under Sections 118(a), 139, and 146 of NI Act. All statutory ingredients were satisfied, warranting six-month imprisonment and compensation of Rs. 15,60,000. The appellate court's decision was deemed appropriate, with no excessive sentencing. Petition dismissed.
HC upheld conviction for dishonour of security cheques under Section 138 of NI Act. The accused issued cheques to repay a loan, which were dishonoured with "insufficient funds" endorsement. The court confirmed that security cheques attract liability for offence. Complainant proved service of legal notice, and accused failed to rebut presumptions under Sections 118(a), 139, and 146 of NI Act. All statutory ingredients were satisfied, warranting six-month imprisonment and compensation of Rs. 15,60,000. The appellate court's decision was deemed appropriate, with no excessive sentencing. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
