Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
HC granted regular bail to accused in GST fraud case involving fake firms and fraudulent input tax credit. Despite ongoing investigation and allegations under CGST Act Sections 132(1)(c), 132(1)(b), and 132(1)(i), the court found insufficient evidence directly linking accused to firm management. Considering potential trial duration, absence of substantive evidence, and low flight risk given official witnesses, the court deemed continued detention unproductive. Bail was allowed subject to furnishing requisite bonds and compliance with trial court's conditions, without expressing opinion on case merits.
HC granted regular bail to accused in GST fraud case involving fake firms and fraudulent input tax credit. Despite ongoing investigation and allegations under CGST Act Sections 132(1)(c), 132(1)(b), and 132(1)(i), the court found insufficient evidence directly linking accused to firm management. Considering potential trial duration, absence of substantive evidence, and low flight risk given official witnesses, the court deemed continued detention unproductive. Bail was allowed subject to furnishing requisite bonds and compliance with trial court's conditions, without expressing opinion on case merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
