Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that reassessment proceedings under section 147 were legally sustainable, focusing on share issue expenses. Despite the assessee's submission of comprehensive evidence including subscriber confirmations, ITR acknowledgments, audited financials, bank statements, and MCA portal data, the tax authorities could not conclusively challenge the transaction's authenticity. The tribunal noted that notices under section 133(6) were complied with by shareholders, and no substantive defects were identified. Consequently, the appellate tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, ruling that additions cannot be made without specific investigative findings or evidence of transactional irregularities.
ITAT held that reassessment proceedings under section 147 were legally sustainable, focusing on share issue expenses. Despite the assessee's submission of comprehensive evidence including subscriber confirmations, ITR acknowledgments, audited financials, bank statements, and MCA portal data, the tax authorities could not conclusively challenge the transaction's authenticity. The tribunal noted that notices under section 133(6) were complied with by shareholders, and no substantive defects were identified. Consequently, the appellate tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, ruling that additions cannot be made without specific investigative findings or evidence of transactional irregularities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.