Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
SC held that the Customs Circular No. 35/2010-Cus is explanatory and retrospective in nature, clarifying the 1% customs duty drawback benefit for merchant exporters who availed CENVAT credit. The court set aside the High Court's impugned judgment, granting the appellant the 1% AIR Customs Duty Drawback on exports from 2008, emphasizing that the circular resolves prior ambiguities without creating new rights or imposing additional burdens on the department. The appeals were disposed of, affirming the retrospective application of the circular to ensure uniform and absolute benefit.
SC held that the Customs Circular No. 35/2010-Cus is explanatory and retrospective in nature, clarifying the 1% customs duty drawback benefit for merchant exporters who availed CENVAT credit. The court set aside the High Court's impugned judgment, granting the appellant the 1% AIR Customs Duty Drawback on exports from 2008, emphasizing that the circular resolves prior ambiguities without creating new rights or imposing additional burdens on the department. The appeals were disposed of, affirming the retrospective application of the circular to ensure uniform and absolute benefit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.