Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC invalidated goods seizure due to procedural non-compliance with GST Act. The court directed authorities to: (i) issue Section 129(3) notice within two days, (ii) ascertain tax documents within three days, (iii) provide notice and opportunity to petitioner, (iv) release petitioner's goods under Section 129(1), and (v) initiate Section 130 proceedings only after completing prescribed steps. The ruling emphasized strict adherence to legal procedures and mandated that tax authorities must follow proper protocols during goods confiscation, highlighting the need for systematic training and procedural sensitization among enforcement officers.
HC invalidated goods seizure due to procedural non-compliance with GST Act. The court directed authorities to: (i) issue Section 129(3) notice within two days, (ii) ascertain tax documents within three days, (iii) provide notice and opportunity to petitioner, (iv) release petitioner's goods under Section 129(1), and (v) initiate Section 130 proceedings only after completing prescribed steps. The ruling emphasized strict adherence to legal procedures and mandated that tax authorities must follow proper protocols during goods confiscation, highlighting the need for systematic training and procedural sensitization among enforcement officers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
