Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
HC invalidated the GST assessment order due to procedural irregularities, specifically the absence of a Document Identification Number (DIN) and the assessing officer's signature. The court set aside the original assessment order in Form GST DRC-07 and the related bank attachment order. The 1st respondent was granted liberty to conduct a fresh assessment after providing proper notice and ensuring appropriate signature. The limitation period is to be calculated excluding the time between the original assessment order and the court's current ruling. No costs were awarded.
HC invalidated the GST assessment order due to procedural irregularities, specifically the absence of a Document Identification Number (DIN) and the assessing officer's signature. The court set aside the original assessment order in Form GST DRC-07 and the related bank attachment order. The 1st respondent was granted liberty to conduct a fresh assessment after providing proper notice and ensuring appropriate signature. The limitation period is to be calculated excluding the time between the original assessment order and the court's current ruling. No costs were awarded.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
