Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
HC dismissed the appeal challenging tax authority's search and seizure operation. The court rejected prayers to quash summons and panchanama, finding they had already been implemented. Regarding seized jewelry, the court granted liberty to the appellant to file an application before the assessing officer seeking release under appropriate conditions. The court directed the assessing officer to commence assessment proceedings within two months and noted inability to direct return of jewelry to specific respondent outside court's jurisdiction. The appeal and connected application were dismissed with specific observations and procedural directions.
HC dismissed the appeal challenging tax authority's search and seizure operation. The court rejected prayers to quash summons and panchanama, finding they had already been implemented. Regarding seized jewelry, the court granted liberty to the appellant to file an application before the assessing officer seeking release under appropriate conditions. The court directed the assessing officer to commence assessment proceedings within two months and noted inability to direct return of jewelry to specific respondent outside court's jurisdiction. The appeal and connected application were dismissed with specific observations and procedural directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.