Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
HC ruled that assessment proceedings were time-barred due to excessive delay in passing remand order by ITAT. The AO failed to issue consequential order within prescribed limitation period. Court directed respondents to grant tax refund for AY 2005-06 with applicable interest under Sections 244A(1) and 244A(1A). The return is deemed accepted, and revenue must process the refund claim expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks, following precedents in similar cases involving procedural limitations in tax assessment proceedings.
HC ruled that assessment proceedings were time-barred due to excessive delay in passing remand order by ITAT. The AO failed to issue consequential order within prescribed limitation period. Court directed respondents to grant tax refund for AY 2005-06 with applicable interest under Sections 244A(1) and 244A(1A). The return is deemed accepted, and revenue must process the refund claim expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks, following precedents in similar cases involving procedural limitations in tax assessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
