Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
HC ruled that assessment proceedings were time-barred due to excessive delay in passing remand order by ITAT. The AO failed to issue consequential order within prescribed limitation period. Court directed respondents to grant tax refund for AY 2005-06 with applicable interest under Sections 244A(1) and 244A(1A). The return is deemed accepted, and revenue must process the refund claim expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks, following precedents in similar cases involving procedural limitations in tax assessment proceedings.
HC ruled that assessment proceedings were time-barred due to excessive delay in passing remand order by ITAT. The AO failed to issue consequential order within prescribed limitation period. Court directed respondents to grant tax refund for AY 2005-06 with applicable interest under Sections 244A(1) and 244A(1A). The return is deemed accepted, and revenue must process the refund claim expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks, following precedents in similar cases involving procedural limitations in tax assessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
