Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
HC ruled that assessment proceedings were time-barred due to excessive delay in passing remand order by ITAT. The AO failed to issue consequential order within prescribed limitation period. Court directed respondents to grant tax refund for AY 2005-06 with applicable interest under Sections 244A(1) and 244A(1A). The return is deemed accepted, and revenue must process the refund claim expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks, following precedents in similar cases involving procedural limitations in tax assessment proceedings.
HC ruled that assessment proceedings were time-barred due to excessive delay in passing remand order by ITAT. The AO failed to issue consequential order within prescribed limitation period. Court directed respondents to grant tax refund for AY 2005-06 with applicable interest under Sections 244A(1) and 244A(1A). The return is deemed accepted, and revenue must process the refund claim expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks, following precedents in similar cases involving procedural limitations in tax assessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
