Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC ruled that assessment proceedings were time-barred due to excessive delay in passing remand order by ITAT. The AO failed to issue consequential order within prescribed limitation period. Court directed respondents to grant tax refund for AY 2005-06 with applicable interest under Sections 244A(1) and 244A(1A). The return is deemed accepted, and revenue must process the refund claim expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks, following precedents in similar cases involving procedural limitations in tax assessment proceedings.
HC ruled that assessment proceedings were time-barred due to excessive delay in passing remand order by ITAT. The AO failed to issue consequential order within prescribed limitation period. Court directed respondents to grant tax refund for AY 2005-06 with applicable interest under Sections 244A(1) and 244A(1A). The return is deemed accepted, and revenue must process the refund claim expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks, following precedents in similar cases involving procedural limitations in tax assessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
