Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT adjudicated an EPCG license dispute concerning export obligation fulfillment. The tribunal found that the DGFT had already certified partial and subsequent full export obligation achievement by the appellant. Despite initial departmental allegations of non-compliance, the DGFT's subsequent certification conclusively established export obligation completion. The tribunal relied on established precedent, determining that DGFT remains the competent authority for evaluating export obligation policy compliance. Consequently, the tribunal set aside customs duty demands, interest, and penalties imposed against the appellant, ruling the departmental action legally unsustainable. The decision effectively validated the appellant's export performance and nullified punitive measures.
CESTAT adjudicated an EPCG license dispute concerning export obligation fulfillment. The tribunal found that the DGFT had already certified partial and subsequent full export obligation achievement by the appellant. Despite initial departmental allegations of non-compliance, the DGFT's subsequent certification conclusively established export obligation completion. The tribunal relied on established precedent, determining that DGFT remains the competent authority for evaluating export obligation policy compliance. Consequently, the tribunal set aside customs duty demands, interest, and penalties imposed against the appellant, ruling the departmental action legally unsustainable. The decision effectively validated the appellant's export performance and nullified punitive measures.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
