Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
CESTAT ruled that gold seizure was unwarranted due to insufficient evidence of foreign origin. Revenue failed to demonstrate reasonable belief under Section 110, while the appellant provided procurement invoices, profit and loss accounts, income tax returns, and GST payment records. The tribunal held the gold confiscation unsustainable, ordered its release to the owner, and vacated associated penalties. The appellate order set aside the original confiscation order, granting complete relief to the appellants and mandating the return of both gold and vehicle.
CESTAT ruled that gold seizure was unwarranted due to insufficient evidence of foreign origin. Revenue failed to demonstrate reasonable belief under Section 110, while the appellant provided procurement invoices, profit and loss accounts, income tax returns, and GST payment records. The tribunal held the gold confiscation unsustainable, ordered its release to the owner, and vacated associated penalties. The appellate order set aside the original confiscation order, granting complete relief to the appellants and mandating the return of both gold and vehicle.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
