Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT ruled that gold seizure was unwarranted due to insufficient evidence of foreign origin. Revenue failed to demonstrate reasonable belief under Section 110, while the appellant provided procurement invoices, profit and loss accounts, income tax returns, and GST payment records. The tribunal held the gold confiscation unsustainable, ordered its release to the owner, and vacated associated penalties. The appellate order set aside the original confiscation order, granting complete relief to the appellants and mandating the return of both gold and vehicle.
CESTAT ruled that gold seizure was unwarranted due to insufficient evidence of foreign origin. Revenue failed to demonstrate reasonable belief under Section 110, while the appellant provided procurement invoices, profit and loss accounts, income tax returns, and GST payment records. The tribunal held the gold confiscation unsustainable, ordered its release to the owner, and vacated associated penalties. The appellate order set aside the original confiscation order, granting complete relief to the appellants and mandating the return of both gold and vehicle.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
