Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
CESTAT ruled that gold seizure was unwarranted due to insufficient evidence of foreign origin. Revenue failed to demonstrate reasonable belief under Section 110, while the appellant provided procurement invoices, profit and loss accounts, income tax returns, and GST payment records. The tribunal held the gold confiscation unsustainable, ordered its release to the owner, and vacated associated penalties. The appellate order set aside the original confiscation order, granting complete relief to the appellants and mandating the return of both gold and vehicle.
CESTAT ruled that gold seizure was unwarranted due to insufficient evidence of foreign origin. Revenue failed to demonstrate reasonable belief under Section 110, while the appellant provided procurement invoices, profit and loss accounts, income tax returns, and GST payment records. The tribunal held the gold confiscation unsustainable, ordered its release to the owner, and vacated associated penalties. The appellate order set aside the original confiscation order, granting complete relief to the appellants and mandating the return of both gold and vehicle.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
