Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The AT rejected the Appellant's review application challenging the reopening of the mutual fund scheme following IL & FS group default. The tribunal found that SEBI, as the regulatory body, had thoroughly examined the matter and confirmed the scheme's reopening was procedurally sound, with necessary approvals and disclosures ensuring investor protection. The tribunal noted the reopening occurred in January 2021, new investors were admitted, and the NAV increased. The tribunal determined that the creation of a segregated portfolio was discretionary for the Asset Management Company, and proceeds would be distributed proportionately among existing investors. Consequently, no grounds were found to set aside the original order.
The AT rejected the Appellant's review application challenging the reopening of the mutual fund scheme following IL & FS group default. The tribunal found that SEBI, as the regulatory body, had thoroughly examined the matter and confirmed the scheme's reopening was procedurally sound, with necessary approvals and disclosures ensuring investor protection. The tribunal noted the reopening occurred in January 2021, new investors were admitted, and the NAV increased. The tribunal determined that the creation of a segregated portfolio was discretionary for the Asset Management Company, and proceeds would be distributed proportionately among existing investors. Consequently, no grounds were found to set aside the original order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
