Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
HC allowed the criminal revision appeal, setting aside the lower court's acquittal order. The court directed a de novo trial from the plea-taking stage, mandating both parties to adduce documentary and oral evidence with opportunity for cross-examination. The trial court was instructed to conclude proceedings within six months, with liberty granted to the complainant to seek substitution of representatives if required. The original judgment was found unsustainable as it improperly acquitted the accused solely on non-examination of the initial authorized representative, disregarding the company's right to substitute its representative.
HC allowed the criminal revision appeal, setting aside the lower court's acquittal order. The court directed a de novo trial from the plea-taking stage, mandating both parties to adduce documentary and oral evidence with opportunity for cross-examination. The trial court was instructed to conclude proceedings within six months, with liberty granted to the complainant to seek substitution of representatives if required. The original judgment was found unsustainable as it improperly acquitted the accused solely on non-examination of the initial authorized representative, disregarding the company's right to substitute its representative.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.