Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
HC allowed the writ petition, directing the petitioner to approach the concerned tax authority within two months to seek restoration of GST registration. The court held that if the petitioner submits pending returns, pays tax dues, interest, and late fees in compliance with CGST Rules, 2017, the authority must expeditiously consider and process the registration restoration. The decision provides a procedural pathway for the petitioner to rectify GST registration cancellation by fulfilling statutory requirements.
HC allowed the writ petition, directing the petitioner to approach the concerned tax authority within two months to seek restoration of GST registration. The court held that if the petitioner submits pending returns, pays tax dues, interest, and late fees in compliance with CGST Rules, 2017, the authority must expeditiously consider and process the registration restoration. The decision provides a procedural pathway for the petitioner to rectify GST registration cancellation by fulfilling statutory requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
