Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC held that under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, while the petitioner was not initially entitled to interest u/s 244A of Income Tax Act, 1961, the designated authority's approval of the scheme and subsequent refund order mandates interest payment on the withheld refund amount. The court directed respondents to pay Rs. 4,39,010/- within 12 weeks, with 12% interest applicable if payment is delayed beyond the prescribed timeline. The petition was substantially allowed, compelling the respondent to compensate the petitioner for delayed refund.
HC held that under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, while the petitioner was not initially entitled to interest u/s 244A of Income Tax Act, 1961, the designated authority's approval of the scheme and subsequent refund order mandates interest payment on the withheld refund amount. The court directed respondents to pay Rs. 4,39,010/- within 12 weeks, with 12% interest applicable if payment is delayed beyond the prescribed timeline. The petition was substantially allowed, compelling the respondent to compensate the petitioner for delayed refund.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.