Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed prosecution proceedings against petitioner for TDS delay, finding no malicious intent. Despite procedural non-compliance, voluntary deposit of TDS with interest before show cause notice negated prosecution requirements. The court emphasized that mere technical breach does not automatically warrant penal action, particularly when the assessee has rectified the default proactively and no deliberate tax evasion was established. Interim protection continued, with no prosecution sanctioned against the petitioner-company.
HC dismissed prosecution proceedings against petitioner for TDS delay, finding no malicious intent. Despite procedural non-compliance, voluntary deposit of TDS with interest before show cause notice negated prosecution requirements. The court emphasized that mere technical breach does not automatically warrant penal action, particularly when the assessee has rectified the default proactively and no deliberate tax evasion was established. Interim protection continued, with no prosecution sanctioned against the petitioner-company.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.