Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the addition to income based on search operation surrender cannot be sustained. No incriminating material was found during search and seizure action at assessee's premises. The statement under Section 132(4) was retracted with detailed explanations, and seized documents did not reveal any undisclosed transactions. The Assessing Officer cannot make additions solely on an unsupported alleged surrender, especially when no evidence substantiates the claim. Under the new legal framework for search assessments, incriminating material is mandatory for reopening assessments beyond three years. The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, effectively rejecting the revenue's proposed income addition.
ITAT held that the addition to income based on search operation surrender cannot be sustained. No incriminating material was found during search and seizure action at assessee's premises. The statement under Section 132(4) was retracted with detailed explanations, and seized documents did not reveal any undisclosed transactions. The Assessing Officer cannot make additions solely on an unsupported alleged surrender, especially when no evidence substantiates the claim. Under the new legal framework for search assessments, incriminating material is mandatory for reopening assessments beyond three years. The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, effectively rejecting the revenue's proposed income addition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.