Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT held that the insolvency application's threshold must be assessed at the time of filing, not subsequent deposit. Despite respondent's partial payment reducing the outstanding amount below Rs. 1 Cr during proceedings, the original filing amount of Rs. 1,16,25,583/- remains determinative. The Tribunal's dismissal was deemed a patent error, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication in accordance with legal principles. The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the original tribunal to reconsider the Section 9 application based on the threshold existing at the time of initial filing.
NCLAT held that the insolvency application's threshold must be assessed at the time of filing, not subsequent deposit. Despite respondent's partial payment reducing the outstanding amount below Rs. 1 Cr during proceedings, the original filing amount of Rs. 1,16,25,583/- remains determinative. The Tribunal's dismissal was deemed a patent error, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication in accordance with legal principles. The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the original tribunal to reconsider the Section 9 application based on the threshold existing at the time of initial filing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.