Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC ruled that the plaintiff is entitled to reimbursement of service tax under the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme 2013, with additional interest of Rs. 26.42 lacs at 10% per annum due to defendant's delay in payment. The court found no valid reason for the defendant's eight-month delay in releasing funds after receiving service tax department clarification on 20th July, 2016. The reimbursement amount of Rs. 3,94,34,035/- was confirmed, and the plaintiff was granted interest if payment is not made within two months from the date of order. The appeal was allowed, and the suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff.
HC ruled that the plaintiff is entitled to reimbursement of service tax under the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme 2013, with additional interest of Rs. 26.42 lacs at 10% per annum due to defendant's delay in payment. The court found no valid reason for the defendant's eight-month delay in releasing funds after receiving service tax department clarification on 20th July, 2016. The reimbursement amount of Rs. 3,94,34,035/- was confirmed, and the plaintiff was granted interest if payment is not made within two months from the date of order. The appeal was allowed, and the suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
