Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC ruled that the plaintiff is entitled to reimbursement of service tax under the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme 2013, with additional interest of Rs. 26.42 lacs at 10% per annum due to defendant's delay in payment. The court found no valid reason for the defendant's eight-month delay in releasing funds after receiving service tax department clarification on 20th July, 2016. The reimbursement amount of Rs. 3,94,34,035/- was confirmed, and the plaintiff was granted interest if payment is not made within two months from the date of order. The appeal was allowed, and the suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff.
HC ruled that the plaintiff is entitled to reimbursement of service tax under the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme 2013, with additional interest of Rs. 26.42 lacs at 10% per annum due to defendant's delay in payment. The court found no valid reason for the defendant's eight-month delay in releasing funds after receiving service tax department clarification on 20th July, 2016. The reimbursement amount of Rs. 3,94,34,035/- was confirmed, and the plaintiff was granted interest if payment is not made within two months from the date of order. The appeal was allowed, and the suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
