Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC set aside the Appellate Order due to procedural irregularities in the appeal process. The Appellate Authority failed to provide a reasoned order, violating principles of natural justice and the right to a fair hearing. The court found the order lacking substantive reasoning, with insufficient notice for hearing and no proper consideration of appeal grounds. The matter was remitted to the Appellate Authority for fresh consideration, directing the petitioner to appear by 16.05.2025. The court explicitly noted no opinion was expressed on the substantive merits of the original appeal, focusing solely on procedural fairness and adherence to principles of natural justice.
HC set aside the Appellate Order due to procedural irregularities in the appeal process. The Appellate Authority failed to provide a reasoned order, violating principles of natural justice and the right to a fair hearing. The court found the order lacking substantive reasoning, with insufficient notice for hearing and no proper consideration of appeal grounds. The matter was remitted to the Appellate Authority for fresh consideration, directing the petitioner to appear by 16.05.2025. The court explicitly noted no opinion was expressed on the substantive merits of the original appeal, focusing solely on procedural fairness and adherence to principles of natural justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.