Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
SC scrutinized a corruption case involving alleged bribe demand and acceptance. Despite prosecution's claims, critical evidentiary inconsistencies emerged regarding the sequence of events, trap procedure, and witness testimonies. The key witnesses' statements contained material contradictions that undermined the prosecution's narrative. The court found the prosecution failed to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Applying the principle of benefit of doubt, the SC set aside the lower courts' conviction, emphasizing procedural safeguards in trap cases and the necessity of unimpeachable evidence in corruption allegations. The appellant was acquitted, with the court highlighting the importance of rigorous judicial scrutiny in such proceedings.
SC scrutinized a corruption case involving alleged bribe demand and acceptance. Despite prosecution's claims, critical evidentiary inconsistencies emerged regarding the sequence of events, trap procedure, and witness testimonies. The key witnesses' statements contained material contradictions that undermined the prosecution's narrative. The court found the prosecution failed to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Applying the principle of benefit of doubt, the SC set aside the lower courts' conviction, emphasizing procedural safeguards in trap cases and the necessity of unimpeachable evidence in corruption allegations. The appellant was acquitted, with the court highlighting the importance of rigorous judicial scrutiny in such proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
