Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
SC affirmed fundamental rights of free expression, holding that courts must protect Article 19(1)(a) constitutional guarantees. The HC's directive to remove online content was deemed unwarranted and disproportionate. The Court emphasized that hosting critical commentary or secondary source materials does not constitute interference with judicial proceedings, absent demonstrable substantial risk of prejudicing trial or justice administration. The judicial approach underscored the principle of open justice, recognizing public's right to access and discuss legal matters. The intermediary's technical platform hosting such content was not prima facie liable for third-party information. Appeal was consequently allowed, reaffirming robust protection of free speech principles.
SC affirmed fundamental rights of free expression, holding that courts must protect Article 19(1)(a) constitutional guarantees. The HC's directive to remove online content was deemed unwarranted and disproportionate. The Court emphasized that hosting critical commentary or secondary source materials does not constitute interference with judicial proceedings, absent demonstrable substantial risk of prejudicing trial or justice administration. The judicial approach underscored the principle of open justice, recognizing public's right to access and discuss legal matters. The intermediary's technical platform hosting such content was not prima facie liable for third-party information. Appeal was consequently allowed, reaffirming robust protection of free speech principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
