Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT upheld the lower authorities' findings in tax assessment proceedings u/s 153A for AY 2011-12 to 2019-20. The tribunal dismissed the assessee's contentions challenging the consolidated order, following precedent in Hitesh Golecha case. The tribunal confirmed additions of unaccounted income by estimating gross profit at 8% and commission at 1% on undisclosed sales. The order was based on the assessee's failure to provide plausible explanations and evasive conduct during proceedings. No substantial legal infirmity was found in the CIT(A)'s order, and the tribunal upheld the assessment order as legally valid.
ITAT upheld the lower authorities' findings in tax assessment proceedings u/s 153A for AY 2011-12 to 2019-20. The tribunal dismissed the assessee's contentions challenging the consolidated order, following precedent in Hitesh Golecha case. The tribunal confirmed additions of unaccounted income by estimating gross profit at 8% and commission at 1% on undisclosed sales. The order was based on the assessee's failure to provide plausible explanations and evasive conduct during proceedings. No substantial legal infirmity was found in the CIT(A)'s order, and the tribunal upheld the assessment order as legally valid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
