Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC upheld the order declaring the petitioners as 'Benamidars' and seized cash as 'benami property'. The court found no violation of natural justice, noting the petitioners failed to respond to notices or appear before authorities to challenge the classification. The bench determined the Adjudicating Authority remains the appropriate forum to definitively determine the benami status of the property. Consequently, the court declined to interfere with the impugned order, directing petitioners to pursue remedies before the designated adjudicatory mechanism.
HC upheld the order declaring the petitioners as 'Benamidars' and seized cash as 'benami property'. The court found no violation of natural justice, noting the petitioners failed to respond to notices or appear before authorities to challenge the classification. The bench determined the Adjudicating Authority remains the appropriate forum to definitively determine the benami status of the property. Consequently, the court declined to interfere with the impugned order, directing petitioners to pursue remedies before the designated adjudicatory mechanism.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.