Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT upheld duty demands against the appellant for intentional undervaluation of transaction and retail sale prices. The tribunal found deliberate evasion of basic customs duty through submission of fraudulent invoices with artificially lowered values. Evidence from overseas investigations confirmed the appellant obtained two sets of invoices - one for actual transaction and another for customs purposes. The tribunal validated the department's findings of mis-declaration, confirmed the duty demand, upheld goods confiscation under section 111 of Customs Act, and imposed penalties under sections 114A and 112. All appellant appeals were consequently dismissed.
CESTAT upheld duty demands against the appellant for intentional undervaluation of transaction and retail sale prices. The tribunal found deliberate evasion of basic customs duty through submission of fraudulent invoices with artificially lowered values. Evidence from overseas investigations confirmed the appellant obtained two sets of invoices - one for actual transaction and another for customs purposes. The tribunal validated the department's findings of mis-declaration, confirmed the duty demand, upheld goods confiscation under section 111 of Customs Act, and imposed penalties under sections 114A and 112. All appellant appeals were consequently dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
