Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
SC resolves apparent conflict between precedents regarding jurisdictional challenges in arbitration proceedings under the Act, 1996. The Court held that while a plea of lack of jurisdiction can generally be raised for the first time under Section 34, an exception exists for cases involving the MP Act, 1983. Where no jurisdictional objection was raised before the arbitral tribunal and an award has been passed, the award cannot be annulled solely on jurisdictional grounds. The Court clarified that Lion Engineering and L.G. Chaudhary (II) decisions are not contradictory but complementary, with L.G. Chaudhary (II) creating a specific limitation on challenging awards. The High Court's judgment was set aside, emphasizing the need to interpret arbitration laws harmoniously.
SC resolves apparent conflict between precedents regarding jurisdictional challenges in arbitration proceedings under the Act, 1996. The Court held that while a plea of lack of jurisdiction can generally be raised for the first time under Section 34, an exception exists for cases involving the MP Act, 1983. Where no jurisdictional objection was raised before the arbitral tribunal and an award has been passed, the award cannot be annulled solely on jurisdictional grounds. The Court clarified that Lion Engineering and L.G. Chaudhary (II) decisions are not contradictory but complementary, with L.G. Chaudhary (II) creating a specific limitation on challenging awards. The High Court's judgment was set aside, emphasizing the need to interpret arbitration laws harmoniously.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
