Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT held that intermediary services related to goods became taxable from 01.10.2014 following amendments to POPS Rules, 2012. Design and development services were determined to be export of services as the place of provision was located outside India, with no third-party involvement. Given voluntary tax registration, service tax compliance, and absence of fraudulent intent, the tribunal found no grounds for extended limitation period. The demand for service tax was consequently set aside, favoring the appellant's position on service classification and tax treatment.
CESTAT held that intermediary services related to goods became taxable from 01.10.2014 following amendments to POPS Rules, 2012. Design and development services were determined to be export of services as the place of provision was located outside India, with no third-party involvement. Given voluntary tax registration, service tax compliance, and absence of fraudulent intent, the tribunal found no grounds for extended limitation period. The demand for service tax was consequently set aside, favoring the appellant's position on service classification and tax treatment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.