Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that petitioner must comply with Circular No. 224/18/2024-GST by making pre-deposit under Section 112(8) of CGST Act and filing a mandatory undertaking/declaration with proper jurisdictional officer. Petitioner demonstrated willingness to submit required documentation. Writ petition disposed of, granting liberty to petitioner to file the requisite undertaking/declaration in accordance with the circular's stipulations, thereby preserving potential appellate rights pending Appellate Tribunal's formal constitution.
HC held that petitioner must comply with Circular No. 224/18/2024-GST by making pre-deposit under Section 112(8) of CGST Act and filing a mandatory undertaking/declaration with proper jurisdictional officer. Petitioner demonstrated willingness to submit required documentation. Writ petition disposed of, granting liberty to petitioner to file the requisite undertaking/declaration in accordance with the circular's stipulations, thereby preserving potential appellate rights pending Appellate Tribunal's formal constitution.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
