PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
CESTAT partially allowed the appeal, reducing penalty under section 112(a) from Rs. 10,00,000/- to Rs. 5,00,000/- and setting aside penalty under section 114AA. The redemption fine of Rs. 10,00,000/- remained unchanged. The tribunal found section 114AA inapplicable due to non-retrospective effect, as the original documents were filed before the section's introduction in 2006. The core findings affirmed the original order's substantive elements while providing partial relief to the appellant through reduced penalties.
CESTAT partially allowed the appeal, reducing penalty under section 112(a) from Rs. 10,00,000/- to Rs. 5,00,000/- and setting aside penalty under section 114AA. The redemption fine of Rs. 10,00,000/- remained unchanged. The tribunal found section 114AA inapplicable due to non-retrospective effect, as the original documents were filed before the section's introduction in 2006. The core findings affirmed the original order's substantive elements while providing partial relief to the appellant through reduced penalties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.