Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
HC allowed the petition challenging tax demand, setting aside the ex-parte order dated 05.10.2023 under Section 74(9) of CGST/KGST Act. The court remitted the matter back to the first respondent, directing the petitioner to appear on 28.04.2025 and providing an opportunity to submit replies and documents. The order emphasizes a justice-oriented approach, allowing the petitioner to contest the proceedings and provide explanations for previous non-compliance. If the petitioner fails to appear on the specified date, the current order will be automatically recalled, and the petition will be restored.
HC allowed the petition challenging tax demand, setting aside the ex-parte order dated 05.10.2023 under Section 74(9) of CGST/KGST Act. The court remitted the matter back to the first respondent, directing the petitioner to appear on 28.04.2025 and providing an opportunity to submit replies and documents. The order emphasizes a justice-oriented approach, allowing the petitioner to contest the proceedings and provide explanations for previous non-compliance. If the petitioner fails to appear on the specified date, the current order will be automatically recalled, and the petition will be restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
