Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
HC allowed the petition challenging tax demand, setting aside the ex-parte order dated 05.10.2023 under Section 74(9) of CGST/KGST Act. The court remitted the matter back to the first respondent, directing the petitioner to appear on 28.04.2025 and providing an opportunity to submit replies and documents. The order emphasizes a justice-oriented approach, allowing the petitioner to contest the proceedings and provide explanations for previous non-compliance. If the petitioner fails to appear on the specified date, the current order will be automatically recalled, and the petition will be restored.
HC allowed the petition challenging tax demand, setting aside the ex-parte order dated 05.10.2023 under Section 74(9) of CGST/KGST Act. The court remitted the matter back to the first respondent, directing the petitioner to appear on 28.04.2025 and providing an opportunity to submit replies and documents. The order emphasizes a justice-oriented approach, allowing the petitioner to contest the proceedings and provide explanations for previous non-compliance. If the petitioner fails to appear on the specified date, the current order will be automatically recalled, and the petition will be restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
