Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
HC allowed the petition challenging tax demand, setting aside the ex-parte order dated 05.10.2023 under Section 74(9) of CGST/KGST Act. The court remitted the matter back to the first respondent, directing the petitioner to appear on 28.04.2025 and providing an opportunity to submit replies and documents. The order emphasizes a justice-oriented approach, allowing the petitioner to contest the proceedings and provide explanations for previous non-compliance. If the petitioner fails to appear on the specified date, the current order will be automatically recalled, and the petition will be restored.
HC allowed the petition challenging tax demand, setting aside the ex-parte order dated 05.10.2023 under Section 74(9) of CGST/KGST Act. The court remitted the matter back to the first respondent, directing the petitioner to appear on 28.04.2025 and providing an opportunity to submit replies and documents. The order emphasizes a justice-oriented approach, allowing the petitioner to contest the proceedings and provide explanations for previous non-compliance. If the petitioner fails to appear on the specified date, the current order will be automatically recalled, and the petition will be restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
