Business deductions and transfer pricing issues: tribunal treatment of software write-offs, donation receipts, warranty provisions, and related expens...
Equivalent value attachment under money laundering law upheld where received funds were treated as proceeds of crime and prior-acquired property could...
HC allowed the petition challenging tax demand, setting aside the ex-parte order dated 05.10.2023 under Section 74(9) of CGST/KGST Act. The court remitted the matter back to the first respondent, directing the petitioner to appear on 28.04.2025 and providing an opportunity to submit replies and documents. The order emphasizes a justice-oriented approach, allowing the petitioner to contest the proceedings and provide explanations for previous non-compliance. If the petitioner fails to appear on the specified date, the current order will be automatically recalled, and the petition will be restored.
HC allowed the petition challenging tax demand, setting aside the ex-parte order dated 05.10.2023 under Section 74(9) of CGST/KGST Act. The court remitted the matter back to the first respondent, directing the petitioner to appear on 28.04.2025 and providing an opportunity to submit replies and documents. The order emphasizes a justice-oriented approach, allowing the petitioner to contest the proceedings and provide explanations for previous non-compliance. If the petitioner fails to appear on the specified date, the current order will be automatically recalled, and the petition will be restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
