Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
HC ruled in favor of the petitioner regarding PPSB bed sheets classification, finding the Appellate Authority erroneously misinterpreted statutory provisions. The court determined that PPSB bed sheets should be taxed at 5% under Chapter 6304, not 12% under Chapter 5603. The HC directed respondents to process the petitioner's refund applications within 12 weeks, including applicable statutory interest, and modified the previous orders that incorrectly classified the bed sheets. The writ petitions were disposed of, effectively overturning the Appellate Authority's previous decisions.
HC ruled in favor of the petitioner regarding PPSB bed sheets classification, finding the Appellate Authority erroneously misinterpreted statutory provisions. The court determined that PPSB bed sheets should be taxed at 5% under Chapter 6304, not 12% under Chapter 5603. The HC directed respondents to process the petitioner's refund applications within 12 weeks, including applicable statutory interest, and modified the previous orders that incorrectly classified the bed sheets. The writ petitions were disposed of, effectively overturning the Appellate Authority's previous decisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
