Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
DSC granted anticipatory bail in GST evasion matter involving fake invoices and input tax credit manipulation. Court found no evidence of applicant evading investigation, noting voluntary appearance and cooperation with Department. Bail granted subject to Rs. 2,00,000 bond with blood relative surety, contingent on potential arrest under Section 69 of GST Act. Department's arguments challenging applicant's credibility were rejected due to lack of concrete material demonstrating flight risk or intentional non-cooperation. Applicant permitted pre-arrest bail with standard judicial safeguards.
DSC granted anticipatory bail in GST evasion matter involving fake invoices and input tax credit manipulation. Court found no evidence of applicant evading investigation, noting voluntary appearance and cooperation with Department. Bail granted subject to Rs. 2,00,000 bond with blood relative surety, contingent on potential arrest under Section 69 of GST Act. Department's arguments challenging applicant's credibility were rejected due to lack of concrete material demonstrating flight risk or intentional non-cooperation. Applicant permitted pre-arrest bail with standard judicial safeguards.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.