Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT adjudicated two key tax issues involving a State Government undertaking. First, the tribunal upheld disallowance of guarantee commission paid to Kerala State Government under section 40(a)(iib), aligning with Supreme Court precedent that fees paid by State Government undertakings are non-deductible. Second, regarding provision for bad and doubtful debts, the tribunal remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration, directing a detailed examination of debt write-offs consistent with Supreme Court guidelines in Vijaya Bank case. The first ground was dismissed, while the second ground was partly allowed for statistical purposes, mandating a fresh assessment of deductibility criteria.
ITAT adjudicated two key tax issues involving a State Government undertaking. First, the tribunal upheld disallowance of guarantee commission paid to Kerala State Government under section 40(a)(iib), aligning with Supreme Court precedent that fees paid by State Government undertakings are non-deductible. Second, regarding provision for bad and doubtful debts, the tribunal remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration, directing a detailed examination of debt write-offs consistent with Supreme Court guidelines in Vijaya Bank case. The first ground was dismissed, while the second ground was partly allowed for statistical purposes, mandating a fresh assessment of deductibility criteria.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.