Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
AT determined appellant violated FEMA, 1999 by illegally possessing unaccounted foreign currency without authorization from RBI. The tribunal found appellant's explanation for foreign currency possession unconvincing and identified mala fide intentions. The seized foreign currency equivalent to INR 3,30,82,775.28 was confiscated under Section 13(2), with a penalty of Rs. One lakh imposed. Additionally, the payment of USD 22,000 to an NRI without RBI permission constituted a breach of Section 3(b), resulting in a supplementary penalty of Rs. 10,000. The appeal was dismissed, and the Adjudicating Authority's original order was fully upheld.
AT determined appellant violated FEMA, 1999 by illegally possessing unaccounted foreign currency without authorization from RBI. The tribunal found appellant's explanation for foreign currency possession unconvincing and identified mala fide intentions. The seized foreign currency equivalent to INR 3,30,82,775.28 was confiscated under Section 13(2), with a penalty of Rs. One lakh imposed. Additionally, the payment of USD 22,000 to an NRI without RBI permission constituted a breach of Section 3(b), resulting in a supplementary penalty of Rs. 10,000. The appeal was dismissed, and the Adjudicating Authority's original order was fully upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.