Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT found a contravention of Section 10(5) of FEMA by the appellant bank in remitting Rs. 47.3 Crores in interest. The bank failed to verify fund utilization and ensure compliance with foreign investment regulations. While initially imposing a Rs. 5 Crores penalty, the AT reduced it to Rs. 50 lakhs, considering the circumstances. The tribunal noted the bank's obligation to obtain declarations and prevent regulatory violations. The appeal was disposed of with directions to return Rs. 4.50 Crores to the appellant bank after retaining the reduced penalty amount.
The AT found a contravention of Section 10(5) of FEMA by the appellant bank in remitting Rs. 47.3 Crores in interest. The bank failed to verify fund utilization and ensure compliance with foreign investment regulations. While initially imposing a Rs. 5 Crores penalty, the AT reduced it to Rs. 50 lakhs, considering the circumstances. The tribunal noted the bank's obligation to obtain declarations and prevent regulatory violations. The appeal was disposed of with directions to return Rs. 4.50 Crores to the appellant bank after retaining the reduced penalty amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.