Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
AT held that ED is not mandatorily required to conduct independent investigation for predicate offence to form "reason to believe" under PMLA. Attachment of bank accounts and assets worth Rs. 2,31,04,618.13 is valid based on existing FIR, police investigation, and scrutiny of financial records. Seizure by police and subsequent attachment by ED do not constitute double attachment, as these are distinct legal processes with different intents. The court emphasized that ED can rely on existing investigative materials to justify attachment without conducting a parallel investigation. Appeal against the attachment order was consequently dismissed.
AT held that ED is not mandatorily required to conduct independent investigation for predicate offence to form "reason to believe" under PMLA. Attachment of bank accounts and assets worth Rs. 2,31,04,618.13 is valid based on existing FIR, police investigation, and scrutiny of financial records. Seizure by police and subsequent attachment by ED do not constitute double attachment, as these are distinct legal processes with different intents. The court emphasized that ED can rely on existing investigative materials to justify attachment without conducting a parallel investigation. Appeal against the attachment order was consequently dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.