Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
SC resolved jurisdictional dispute regarding arbitral proceedings under MSMED Act, affirming Facilitation Council's exclusive jurisdiction where MSME supplier is located. The Court upheld prior precedent in Mahakali case, determining that Section 18(4) of MSMED Act specifically vests arbitration jurisdiction in the council where supplier is domiciled. In this instance, Delhi Facilitation Council was deemed competent to conduct arbitration through Delhi Arbitration Centre. The SC allowed the appeal, set aside the Karnataka HC order, and directed arbitral proceedings to be conducted consistent with statutory mandate.
SC resolved jurisdictional dispute regarding arbitral proceedings under MSMED Act, affirming Facilitation Council's exclusive jurisdiction where MSME supplier is located. The Court upheld prior precedent in Mahakali case, determining that Section 18(4) of MSMED Act specifically vests arbitration jurisdiction in the council where supplier is domiciled. In this instance, Delhi Facilitation Council was deemed competent to conduct arbitration through Delhi Arbitration Centre. The SC allowed the appeal, set aside the Karnataka HC order, and directed arbitral proceedings to be conducted consistent with statutory mandate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
