Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
AAR ruled that the applicant cannot claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) for IGST on imported warranty parts where the foreign supplier (M/s. MUEGGE GmbH) paid the tax. Despite importing parts in the applicant's name for warranty services, the ITC cannot be availed since the tax was discharged by the foreign supplier, and the invoice for warranty service did not include spare parts cost. The ruling interprets section 16 of CGST Act, 2017, denying ITC eligibility based on the specific transactional arrangement between the parties.
AAR ruled that the applicant cannot claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) for IGST on imported warranty parts where the foreign supplier (M/s. MUEGGE GmbH) paid the tax. Despite importing parts in the applicant's name for warranty services, the ITC cannot be availed since the tax was discharged by the foreign supplier, and the invoice for warranty service did not include spare parts cost. The ruling interprets section 16 of CGST Act, 2017, denying ITC eligibility based on the specific transactional arrangement between the parties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
